Repository navigation
docs: add another JSON validator option - #7590
Closed
coderaviverma wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
coderaviverma wants to merge 1 commit into
coderaviverma wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The publisher configuration guide currently recommends JSONLint for checking embedded JSON configuration. This adds JSONViewerTool's dedicated JSON Validator as another browser-based option while keeping the existing recommendation and warning about invalid configuration objects.
Disclosure: I am affiliated with JSONViewerTool. Please include this only if maintainers independently find it useful for Hypothesis publishers.
Validation:
git diff --checkmake checkdocscould not run locally because this machine does not have the repository-requiredpyenvsetup