[MaggieAppleton]

An explicit request such as “add these options to the decision” was rejected when it followed discussion in the same Chat message. Chopin then wrote a table beside the card instead of adding selectable options.

Recognise trailing imperative requests and resolve “the decision” only when one editable open choice card is eligible. Preserve named targeting and reject ambiguous, quoted, hypothetical, withdrawn or deferred instructions. Context introduced by a colon keeps its scope across later clauses and paragraphs; unexplained prose after a directive cancels the request. Clarify that append-only tool calls omit title; decision records and document projections still commit together without selecting an answer.

Validation on source commit 1b9eaac30 (final head c904a2f22 adds only lane memory): 60 focused tests, including the exact reported request, persisted four-option card, and conditional/example scope regressions; full TypeScript checks and bun run ci. Independently reviewed. All final-head GitHub checks pass, including browser and container jobs.

The earlier broad macOS suite had 16 failures: 15 reproduced on unchanged main; one passed in isolation on both branches. It was not rerun for this narrow follow-up. The downloaded final-head browser report records 863 integration tests passing immediately, one responsive content-swap test passing on retry, and six skipped. Design and diagram suites have no retries or failures. The responsive case also flaked on the unchanged base.