Skip to content

chore: update rhiza to v1.11.1 - #1037

Merged
tschm merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
rhiza_v1.11.1_20261103
Nov 3, 2026
Merged

tschm merged 4 commits into
mainfrom
rhiza_v1.11.1_20261103

Conversation

@tschm

@tschm tschm commented Nov 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Template jebel-quant/rhiza: v1.9.0 → v1.11.1.

v1.11.1 is a maintenance release whose only change over v1.11.0 is rhiza#1749 (rhiza-task 1.9.1, which pins pytest-benchmark 5.3.1). The reusable workflows at v1.11.0 run rhiza-task 1.8.1, which pins pytest-benchmark 5.2.3. That version reads Node._nodeid, which pytest 9.2 removed, so book / build fails on #1036. After this merges, rebase #1036 to pick up the new workflows.

Changed (template-owned files only)

  • .github/CONFIG.md
  • .github/workflows/rhiza_benchmark.yml
  • .github/workflows/rhiza_book.yml
  • .github/workflows/rhiza_ci.yml
  • .github/workflows/rhiza_codeql.yml
  • .github/workflows/rhiza_marimo.yml
  • .github/workflows/rhiza_paper.yml
  • .github/workflows/rhiza_release.yml
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml
  • .rhiza/scripts/release_publish.py
  • Makefile
  • .rhiza/template.yml / .rhiza/template.lock

Conflicts

7 workflow files conflicted, mostly Dependabot's @v1.11.0 ref and action-pin bumps. All were resolved by taking upstream. Nothing was left unstaged.

No gates were run. Run /rhiza:quality for a scorecard.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

tschm and others added 4 commits November 3, 2026 09:46
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The v1.11.1 sync moves the pre-commit ruff pin from 0.16.6 to 0.17.0,
whose import-convention rule wants `import datetime as dt`. Autofix only.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
5.2.3 reads the private Node._nodeid that pytest 9.2 removed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@tschm
tschm merged commit 14e4824 into main Nov 3, 2026
49 checks passed
@tschm
tschm deleted the rhiza_v1.11.1_20261103 branch November 3, 2026 15:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant